Skip to main content
ATS Comparison

Cumino vs Inrecruiting

Inrecruiting and Cumino share the Italian market and a focus on GDPR/AI Act compliance, but address different needs: Inrecruiting is a classic ATS with a structured selection flow, while Cumino is an AI-native ATS specialised in high-volume and blue-collar sectors thanks to Voice-to-CV technology.

What is Inrecruiting

Inrecruiting is an Italian ATS widely adopted by mid-to-large enterprises and staffing agencies, developed by the Zucchetti group. It focuses on end-to-end recruitment management with a strong emphasis on Italian compliance.

Inrecruiting official site

What they have in common

  • GDPR compliance and full Italian localisation
  • Integrations with leading Italian job boards (LinkedIn, InfoJobs, Monster)
  • Kanban pipeline and recruiting reporting
  • Multi-tenant for agencies with multiple branches

Key differences

Keeping the database current

Cumino

A candidate already on file gets a message, reopens the assistant and talks for two minutes: the profile comes back current and mapped to ESCO, with no data entry. Recognised across campaigns, so updated rather than duplicated

Inrecruiting

The database stays in their system; refreshing the profiles is not among the stated features

Application source

Cumino

WhatsApp and Telegram with Voice-to-CV in 16 languages, web forms and job boards

Inrecruiting

Web forms and job boards, written-CV parsing

Native AI

Cumino

ESCO intelligent matching, automatic voice screening, EU AI Act bias monitoring

Inrecruiting

AI being progressively introduced, focused on CV parsing and suggestions

Primary verticals

Cumino

Blue-collar and high-volume: logistics, construction, manufacturing, hospitality, retail

Inrecruiting

Generalist, strong in admin, IT, retail

Candidate languages

Cumino

16 languages across conversational channels, 14 with the voice agent: including Hindi, Arabic, Urdu, Bengali, Tagalog, Romanian, Albanian, Ukrainian

Inrecruiting

Main European languages

Time to onboarding

Cumino

3-month Pilot Program (€9,000) to test with real data

Inrecruiting

Traditional onboarding with consultancy

ATS or layer?

Cumino

Full ATS: runs standalone or as a layer on top of the ATS already in place

Inrecruiting

Full ATS, designed to be the central system of record for hiring

Technical openness

Cumino

Integrates with any ATS that exposes APIs; programmatic access to Cumino on request; native connectors on Enterprise plans

Inrecruiting

Catalogue integrations with the Zucchetti ecosystem and Italian job boards

When to choose which

Choose Cumino if

  • Candidate volumes >500/month, mainly blue-collar
  • Need to collect applications from non-tech-savvy or non-Italian-speaking workers
  • ESCO skill-based matching required, not keyword
  • EU AI Act compliance required by procurement

Why run them together

  • Mid volumes (50-500/month), mixed white-collar/blue-collar
  • Preference for an ATS already established in the Italian market
  • Preferred integration with Zucchetti-group tools
  • And if one day you want to consolidate on a single tool: Cumino was built later, on today's technology, with public pricing and live in days, not a migration project

Pricing

Cumino: transparent public plans (Pay-as-you-go €15/cand, Steel €1,999/month, Platinum €4,999/month, Enterprise custom). Inrecruiting: pricing typically on custom quote.

FAQ

Which ATS is better: Cumino or Inrecruiting?

Inrecruiting and Cumino share the Italian market and a focus on GDPR/AI Act compliance, but address different needs: Inrecruiting is a classic ATS with a structured selection flow, while Cumino is an AI-native ATS specialised in high-volume and blue-collar sectors thanks to Voice-to-CV technology.

When should you choose Cumino instead of Inrecruiting?

Candidate volumes >500/month, mainly blue-collar. Need to collect applications from non-tech-savvy or non-Italian-speaking workers. ESCO skill-based matching required, not keyword. EU AI Act compliance required by procurement.

When is Inrecruiting the right pick?

Mid volumes (50-500/month), mixed white-collar/blue-collar. Preference for an ATS already established in the Italian market. Preferred integration with Zucchetti-group tools. And if one day you want to consolidate on a single tool: Cumino was built later, on today's technology, with public pricing and live in days, not a migration project.

How much does Cumino cost vs Inrecruiting?

Cumino: transparent public plans (Pay-as-you-go €15/cand, Steel €1,999/month, Platinum €4,999/month, Enterprise custom). Inrecruiting: pricing typically on custom quote.

Not sure which to pick?

In 30 minutes our team helps you frame your real recruiting requirements, without pushing Cumino if it isn't the right fit.

Talk to a consultantSee Cumino pricing